
-11-
PLAINTIFF AQUATIC AV, INC’S AM. DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS AND INFRINGEMENT
CONTENTIONS / Case No. 3-14-cv-01931-WHA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SSV was also aware of the ‘756 patent since at least January 2011, before it began making,
using, selling, offering for sale and/or importing the Accused Instrumentalities. On information and
belief, SSV had actual notice that it is infringing the ‘756 patent, at least as early as January 2011,
but no later than November 2013, when it received notice of Aquatic’s infringement notice letter to
Magnadyne. Nonetheless, SSV continued its activities with respect to the Accused Instrumentalities
despite the objectively high likelihood that its actions constituted infringement of at least the ‘756
patent.
AQUATIC’S ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENT PRODUCTION
Aquatic identifies the following documents, which may correspond to Patent Local rules 3-2
categories (a), (b), (c), (d), and (e).
Patent Local Rule 3-2(a): Aquatic identifies Bates Nos. AQUATIC000405 –
AQUATIC000453.
Patent Local Rule 3-2(b): Aquatic identifies Bates Nos. AQUATIC000405 –
AQUATIC000453.
Patent Local Rule 3-2(c): Aquatic identifies Bates Nos. AQUATIC000001 –
AQUATIC000404.
Patent Local Rule 3-2(d): Aquatic identifies Bates Nos. AQUATIC000454 –
AQUATIC000456.
Patent Local Rule 3-2(e): Aquatic identifies Bates Nos. AQUATIC000457 –
AQUATIC000636.
Aquatic continues to investigate the facts relating to this action. Aquatic anticipates that, as
this action proceeds, further documents may be discovered, or their significance better understood,
and Aquatic reserves the right to modify, amend, and/or supplement its responses with such
pertinent documents.
Pursuant to the Protective Order authorized by Patent Local Rule 2-2, Aquatic has
designated certain documents as confidential pursuant to the Protective Order authorized by the
Northern District of California.
Case3:14-cv-01931-WHA Document87-2 Filed02/03/15 Page12 of 13
Komentáře k této Příručce